« Central Falls: Second shooting victim dies |
Today
| Ethics Commission declines to investigate Lynch »
August 22, 2006
ACLU urges TASER moratorium
PROVIDENCE -- The head of Rhode Island's ACLU sent a letter to police chiefs across the state today, urging them to stop using TASER guns on suspects in light of the weekend death of a 41-year-old Woonsocket man.
Timothy R. Picard died Sunday morning after being shot twice with a TASER gun while in police custody. The medical examiner has yet to release autopsy results detailing the cause of death.
But in his letter, ACLU executive director Steven Brown blames the TASER for contributing to Picard's death.
"Unfortunately, this death was in some sense inevitable in light of the continually-growing evidence that stun guns are not the non-lethal device that proponents purport them to be," Brown wrote. "At the very least, however, in light of the evidence that is already available, this death should serve as a wake-up call that the Taser’s use is potentially lethal and should only be employed as an alternative to deadly force."
The Rhode Island ACLU sent a similar letter to police chiefs in 2004, urging department's to "carefully examine" their decision to use TASER guns.
In today's letter, Brown called on police chief to implement a moratorium on TASER use "until additional information can be gathered on this tragic incident, until the safety of the weapon has been independently and more thoroughly scrutinized by your department, and until your department has had a chance to carefully review both its policies and training procedures governing the weapon’s use."
Brown also requested copies of any policies, procedures and training materials police departments have regarding TASER use.
-- projo.com staff writer Steve Peoples
Posted by Steve Peoples
at 11:20 AM | Permalink
Mark | August 22, 2006 12:07 PM link
don miller | August 22, 2006 12:13 PM link
Jonathan Perri | August 23, 2006 10:09 AM link
Greg | August 23, 2006 1:05 PM link
Mark | August 23, 2006 2:43 PM link
GOMES | August 25, 2006 10:48 AM link
Greg | August 25, 2006 12:27 PM link
Post a comment
Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.
While I understand the concern the ACLU has, what are police to do with someone who goes animal on them - 250 lbs worth at that? I'm sure we wouldn't have heard a word from Mr. Brown if an officer was hurt or even killed in the line of duty because there were no options open to them to subdue someone who goes nuts on them. But then, we as Americans tend to be more concerned with the rights of the criminal than the victims.