Projo 7 to 7 News BlogTaking the news pulse of Rhode Island and Southeastern Massachusetts, by Providence Journal and projo.com staff, from 7 to 7, every business day |
|
Get the 7 to 7 on your mobile at www.projo.com. Twitter: projo | RSS | Email alerts
« House Finance Committee approves student impact fee |
Main
| Sex-trafficking measure clears House, Senate »
WEST WARWICK, R.I. -- In a vote that was largely symbolic, West Warwick residents Thursday night overwhelmingly rejected the same $49.2-million School Committee budget it rebuffed in a previous Financial Town Meeting five weeks ago. But unlike the previous meeting, where a $30.5-million municipal budget was also rejected by angry taxpayers, the 647 voters who packed the high school auditorium Thursday overwhelmingly approved an identical proposal, mostly because town officials said a "no" vote would produce layoffs in the police, fire and public works departments. The schools vote was essentially meaningless because $49.2 million is the same amount voters approved at last year's town meeting, and state law says the old budget remains in effect unless a new one is approved. Only two of the five Town Council members voted to approve the school appropriation. A motion to cut the School Department budget by an additional $2.5 million by Vincent Marzullo, cofounder of the citizens group We the People of West Warwick, was ruled out of order after Town Solicitor Gregory E. Inman explained that the Town Charter and state law did not permit the amount to be reduced. The appropriation could be approved or rejected, Inman said. it could not be amended. That sparked a long diatribe by Marzullo, who said he didn't believe it. Inman said Marzullo or the council could try to do it, but he was adamant that "it's an exercise in futility." The School Committee didn't exactly go into the meeting riding a wave of goodwill from the public. It has overspent its appropriation in the current fiscal year to the point where the school department cannot pay teachers for work they have already done. That's because, one year ago, it put $3 million in expenses in its budget but didn't have the projected revenue to cover it. The committee then went to court to try to force the town to cough up those funds, but that case is still pending. The committee's budget for the 2010 fiscal year, which begins July 1, also calls for spending money it may not get; the amount this time is $528,975. But Chairwoman Lindagay Palazzo vowed that the schools will live within this budget and would not go to court seeking more. She said the school department will be able to make do with the same amount because the unions have since made significant concessions. Said Kenneth M. Sheehan, "We have cut over $4.1 million" in the past year. But most voters were not impressed, with one woman insisting that a reduction of $4.1 million "obviously is not enough." One of the more surreal moments came after the most vocal council critic of the School Department, Angelo A. Padula Jr., was told that 86 percent of the School Department budget went for salaries and benefits. That, Padula concluded, means that only "14 percent goes to our children." After one resident learned that it costs about $15,000 to educate each child in West Warwick, she suggested that the town simply send its students to private Catholic schools. Padula quickly agreed, saying, "If we sent 200 children to a private school, Prout is $9,500. LaSalle is $9,800. We would save $6,000 per child." Residents also looked for savings on the proposed municipal budget, with its increase of $268,744 over the current appropriation. It will raise the tax rate by 90 cents per $1,000 of valuation. "We can't give you any more because there is no more to give," one frustrated resident complained. Town Manager James Thomas noted that during the May Town Meeting, some voters had sought a drastic $2.5 million cut. If the proposed budget were rejected again and the Town Council tried to make such cuts, "it will touch your life," he said. Eight workers in the Police Department and eight in the Fire Department would be laid off, nine in public works would go, half the streetlights in town would be turned off, and the senior center and library would probably have to be closed. "Yard waste will not be picked up; it will not be a priority," Thomas said. "That's a lot to lose for less than a dollar a day" that it would cost the typical taxpayer. gemery@projo.com / (401)277-7442 CommentsLeave a commentPlease be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish. |
|
|
|
Increased taxation to the residents of West Warwick and all of RI cities and towns has to stop..layoffs, decrease in town services, have to happen. Ar my place of employment 16 people have been layed off, unfortunate but necessary..I am planning to leave W Warwick and if necessary RI. The cost of living here is ridiculous. Union control & pensions never get the big "kickout" that is needed and necessary. Legislators and those in charge of town finances have the backbone of jelly fish. It is about time the citizens rise up and say no to increased spending, unions and those who seek to benefit their own pockets.
Report Abuse
It was sickening to see just how easy it was for the politicians to frighten the elderly into voting for their budget. Shutting lights off at night, laying off 16 from the fire and police really scared them into doing exactly what the politicians wanted them to do........just sickening. They also said they would shut down the senior center too. I saw 2 politicians stop in the crowd of elderly to tell them "remember we want to save the senior center".....absolutely disgusting!!!
They have 1.9 million in OT they could have gone after but never even tried.....why? UNIONS! The politicians scared the elderly because it was the best choice for THEM....not their constituents.
Many people testified they would be looking elsewhere to live....they can include me on that too. This is just how a town dies. Taxes get raised by lying politicians to help the unions who have undue influence. Middle class home owners sell out to go somewhere more reasonable. Finally the only ones left are the elderly and poor. Businesses leave further cutting down taxes and the town can't survive.
Nice!
Report Abuse