Projo 7 to 7 News Blog

Taking the news pulse of Rhode Island and Southeastern Massachusetts, by Providence Journal and projo.com staff, from 7 to 7, every business day

Get the 7 to 7 on your mobile at www.projo.com. Twitter: projo | RSS | Email alerts

RI House passes open records bill

8:04 PM Tue, Jun 23, 2009 |
Karen Ziner    Email

PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- The House on Tuesday passed an amended version of an open records bill that eliminates what supporters had called "a huge advance" - a requirement that initial police narratives be made public.

Some of those supporters said they will meet on Wednesday to discuss their options.

"The changes that were made are very troubling and all the groups that have been working on this bill are going to sit down and discuss the ramifications of those amendments," said Steven Brown, executive director of the Rhode Island affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union, one of several open records advocacy groups that supported the legislation.

"But I'd emphasize that the attorney general has held for some time that the initial narrative reports are in fact a public record," said Brown. "The House vote to the contrary today is a major step backward in the scope of the statute."

Meanwhile, Rep. Edith H. Ajello, D-Providence, the bill's prime sponsor, asked that the bill be held on the desk, meaning it will not be sent immediately to the Senate for a vote.

Ajello said that as long as the bill remains on the House side, it can still be amended. She said, "I'd love to bring it up again to make it whole."

The 46-22 vote followed nearly two hours of debate on a bill that supporters had said will significantly widen access to public records by requiring the police to release basic arrest information within 24 hours, and making it easier for average persons to get records "without hassle."

The Senate unanimously passed a measure last week that included the clarification that initial police narratives be made public. It was sponsored by Sen. J. Michael Lenihan, D-East Greenwich.

The House bill, H-5136, had been recrafted to mirror the Senate bill.

The legislation shortens to 7 days from 10 days the time during which a public body must respond to a records request. It also boosts fines for police and other public agencies that ignore the deadlines.
But whether Governor Carcieri will sign the bills -- or veto it as he did last year is unknown.

State Police legal counsel Lisa Holley said Tuesday that the department still has reservations, including to the 7-day window for responding to records requests. "Seven days is huge for us," Holley said. "It makes it over-burdensome for us."

Carcieri spokeswoman Amy Kempe said the governor will take those objections into consideration, after a full review of the final measure.

The legislation:

• Shortens the time in which a public body must respond to a records request to 7 business days from 10 business days.

• Increases the fine to $5,000 from $1,000 for "a knowing and willful violation" of the open-records law.

• Makes public certain records that had not previously been considered public, including municipal pension records and records of payments received by employees as a result of termination or otherwise leaving public employment

• Specifies that certain portions of police reports are deemed public and must be released within 24 hours, including the name, home address (provided it does not reveal the identity of a crime victim who is a minor), date of birth, gender and race; the charge or charges; the date, time; and the name of the arresting officer.

• Formalizes training and certification requirements for all state and municipal officers and employees of public bodies who handle records requests, and requires every public body to designate a public-records officer; and explain how and where to make public records requests..

Both the House and Senate bills are supported by the Rhode Island Press Association, the nonprofit freedom-of-information coalition ACCESS/RI, Common Cause Rhode Island, the Rhode Island Affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union and the Rhode Island Attorney General's Office.

Steven Brown, executive director of the ACLU's local affiliate, said passage of the legislation "will put Rhode Island more in line with the open record laws of other New England states," particularly in terms of response times for releasing records.

"Every New England state, except Massachusetts, has a response time of five days or less," Brown said. "With passage of this bill, the legislature is taking some very positive steps."

Scott Pickering, executive director of the Rhode Island Press Association, said the requirement that the narrative report must be released as part of the initial arrest report is a "huge advance," and brings statewide consistency.

"The officer's narrative is critical in understanding why police take people off the streets put them behind bars and charge them. Lacking that report -- whether it's the media or an average citizen or anyone from public -- all you can get is the name, address age and age" of an adult who has been arrested. "That gives you almost no understanding why and how police exercise one of government's highest powers."

Pickering said the 24-hour release requirement is also "a critical advancement."

"To think that under current law they have 10 business days or two weeks to let anyone in public know they've arrested an adult and why and what they've charged them with -- that's absurd that they're not required to release reports sooner than that. Many do, but this would require within 24 hours and I think that's a critical advancement."

When records custodians demand personal information from requesters before releasing public documents or demand to know why the documents are being sought, a subtle chilling effect is exerted over people seeking information from their government.

By eliminating these types of practices, this legislation marks an important step forwarding in strengthening the public's right to know.

John Marion, executive director of Common Cause, said that while police records have been a major focus, "there are a lot of things in this bill that don't apply to police records that are huge steps forward for public-records law."

social bookmarking


Leave a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.




Type the characters you see in the picture above.