Projo 7 to 7 News BlogTaking the news pulse of Rhode Island and Southeastern Massachusetts, by Providence Journal and projo.com staff, from 7 to 7, every business day |
|
Get the 7 to 7 on your mobile at www.projo.com. Twitter: projo | RSS | Email alerts
« 'First light' tonight at CCRI's new telescope in Warwick |
Main
| Justice Rodgers retiring; daughter nominated for court »
By STEVE PEOPLES PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- The General Assembly has released a $7.76-billion spending plan for the coming fiscal year that restores cuts to human service programs, but relies on a 2-cent gas tax increase, sweeping pension changes, and the elimination of a tax break on capital gains to pay for it. Overall, lawmakers were charged with filling the largest budget deficit in decades, an estimated $590 million, or 19 percent of state spending. House Finance Committee chairman Steven M. Costantino, generally considered the architect of the Assembly's budget, noted that the final plan doesn't hurt as many people as it could have. There was no sales tax increase, as has been proposed in other states. Separate proposals to raise beer taxes and taxes on services such as car repairs were ignored. And lawmakers also left in place a tax break for high-earners, known as the flat tax alternative, which was the subject of intense lobbying from interest groups and rank-and-file members. The plan -- the result of weeks of closed-door negotiations with Senate leaders -- is being discussed in detail in the Finance Committee Wednesday afternoon, but House leaders held a separate briefing for the media earlier in the day. To close the budget hole in the Assembly's budget plan for the fiscal year that begins July 1, lawmakers largely relied upon the federal stimulus package signed by President Obama earlier in the year. The spending plan, which is set to go to the full House chamber next Wednesday, uses $226.5 million in federal dollars that will dry up in the coming years. Projections released Wednesday by the House fiscal office detail an estimated $422.7 million budget hole for fiscal 2012, the first year the federal stimulus funds aren't available. The current proposal also saves almost $58 million through an across-the-board cut for all state departments for the coming year, including the Assembly's individual budget. Futher, the plan eliminates the Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner altogether. Sweeping changes in pension rules for state workers are expected to save as much as $45 million. None of the changes would apply to anyone eligible to retire on Sept. 30, a move aimed at averting the kind of mass exodus the state saw in the weeks before the last major retiree benefit change. But for others, the new rules governing the minimum age for retirement, the benefit accrual rates and annual cost-of-living increases would begin on Oct. 1. All but the newest state workers can now retire and start collecting a pension at any age after 28 years of work, or at age 60 after as little as 10 years of work, with guaranteed 3-percent compounded annual increases. Under the new rules, the state would adopt age 62 as the new "target'' age for retirement. In actuality, however, the minimum age for retirement would vary widely depending on how long an employee had worked and how close he or she was to qualifying for retirement. On taxes, Rhode Island's 31-cent gas tax would go up 2 cents as of July 1, generating an estimated $4.5 million for the troubled Rhode Island Public Transit Authority. Other controversial components include the elimination of preferential treatment for taxpayers who profit from the sale of stocks, bonds and other such investments. The plan would generate an estimated $23.6 million for the state by treating all capital gains as ordinary income, according to House fiscal office projections. The budget proposal also rejects Governor Carcieri's plans to cut the state's corporate income tax. The plan, while embraced by local businesses, would have cost the state $14.5 million in lost tax revenue next year. But in a small victory for the governor, the Assembly agreed to increase the value of estates subject to Rhode Island's estate tax to $850,000, a number that would be adjusted in accordance with the consumer price index each year. The plan includes something dubbed the "Amazon tax," which would force some people to pay taxes on Internet purchases, if the purchaser is referred by a local web site. Following New York's lead, the provision would sometimes force retailers such as Amazon to collect Rhode Island's 7-percent sales tax. On human services, the budget completely restores funding for Rhode Island's Pharmaceutical Assistance to the Elderly program, which currently offers reduced prescriptions drugs to about 18,600 disabled and elderly residents. It also maintains funding for dental services for 38,000 low-income parents enrolled in the RIte Care program and continues to pay for subsidized health insurance for 28 moderate-income pregnant women slated to lose coverage. The developmentally-disabled community had feared it would be cut far deeper than what the governor had proposed in March. The governor's plan to reduce funding by $4.4 million for the coming year was accepted. And nursing homes will lose significant state dollars. But the cut wasn't as bad as it could have been. The legislature restored about $1.9 million in funding for "nursing home acuity rates" that the governor planned to eliminate. Cities and towns were roughly in the same situation. They lost $55 million in general revenue sharing, as expected, but no more. The state budget released by the House Finance Committee Wednesday represents $7.76 billion in spending. Of that total, $2.98 billion represents state-only spending, known as "general revenue." The rest largely comes from the federal government. Overall spending is up 12 percent from the $6.92-billion state budget approved by lawmakers for the current fiscal year. But the general revenue portion is down, roughly 10 percent, from the $3.28 billion originally approved for the current year. The proposal, which is expected to be approved by the House Finance Committee Wednesday, is expected to be reviewed by the full House of Representatives next Wednesday, giving rank-and-file members and interest groups time to fight for changes. Once approved by the House, the budget could go to the Senate the following day. Governor Caricieri, who could veto the plan but doesn't have enough legislative support to sustain it, had no immediate comment on specific proposals. "The governor is reviewing the budget," said spokeswoman Amy Kempe. CommentsLeave a commentPlease be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish. |
|
|
|
Why would the legislature allow the eligible State employees to remain on the payroll?
The State employees who are eligible to retire make the most money, have the most time accumulated and have attitude problems, entitlement issues.
This looks like a way to protect someone's "friend"......
Do the right thing......GET THEM ALL OFF THE PAYROLL1
Report Abuse
Getting them off the payroll, as suggested above, costs the state money. The state would have to start paying out their pension and lose the 8.75% employee contribution.
Report Abuse
Well thats nice Mr. Costantino feels that this budget doesnt hurt as many people. After all the testimonies that you heard (the finance commtee) how do you sleep at night. Yes we are going to fix bridges because thats where most of us will be. Have you been (house, senate & finance?) maybe you should have gone to see who is living there. Families, single mothers, fathers, people who lost there homes & wipe out there retirement, young adults who cant find jobs & the ones who were sick & was wipe out. As for pension, YES I AM A STATE WORKER, and works hard & I have seen jobs being created in 6 digits,upgrades, prom's nothing has stop and the people think its the state workers. God bless all of u and HE is the one you can not hide from
Report Abuse
There is one item in this story that infuriates my senses - why did you approve a 2 cent increase on such a basic need as gasoline, but ignored the puny 2 cent increase on a glass of beer - Tax that glass of beer!! We must help reverse our number one in the nation substance abuse ranking!! An absence due to impaired workers is also a significant problem with employers - why aren't they pushing this tax!
However, my congratulations to the finance committee on balancing countless hours of meetings, documents, testimony, with what seems to be a palatable mix of pain.
Please reconsider this and make this amendment!!
YOU TOO SENATE!!
Report Abuse
maggie - the state can't just let older employees go because they are old or could retire if they wanted to - that would age discrimination. What seems totally crazy is trying to collect an internet sales tax. There is no way that could be enforced in a equitable manner.
Report Abuse