Projo 7 to 7 News BlogTaking the news pulse of Rhode Island and Southeastern Massachusetts, by Providence Journal and projo.com staff, from 7 to 7, every business day |
|
Get the 7 to 7 on your mobile at www.projo.com. Twitter: projo | RSS | Email alerts
« Update: Man charged in North Providence stabbing |
Main
| Man subdued after kicking out the window of police cruiser »
"As a person of faith, I believe that we are called to care for each other and work to ease human suffering,'' Mr. Obama told an enthusiastic audience of about 200 in the East Room of the White House. Mr. Obama left to Congress the next simmering controversy over whether to plow federal money into direct research on actual human embryos, as well as on the stem cells derived from them. There were cheers from the crowd -- which included a scattering of conservative politicians and foes of abortion, among them Rhode Island Rep. James R. Langevin -- when Mr. Obama signed an executive order undoing former President George W. Bush's 2001 ban on federal subsidies for research on all but a few lines of existing human embryonic stem cells. Langevin, one of more than 20 lawmakers on hand, told reporters outside the White House, "I have been paralyzed now for over 28 years and I've always believed that someday I would walk again.'' That possibility "has become more real'' with Mr. Obama's action to spur human embryonic stem cell research, said Democrat Langevin. Mr. Obama referred briefly in his 11-minute speech to the "many thoughtful and decent people,'' as he called them, who "are conflicted about, or strongly oppose'' embryonic stem cell research. He added, too, that he will support efforts - vigorously backed by Bush - "to convert ordinary human cells into ones that resemble embryonic stem cells.'' Opponents of embryonic stem cell research strongly disagree. They argue that some scientists will push all the harder now for support for unfettered creation of new embryos expressly for research -- and even for human cloning, not necessarily to reproduce human children but to advance medical inquiry into potentially lucrative treatments and cures. Many authorities believe that embryonic stem cells have properties that give them greater curative potential than any alternative cells. But opponents of the research assert that it is morally wrong because it entails the destruction of human embryos. Douglas Johnson of the National Right to Life Committee asserted in a news release that, besides the moral question, Mr. Obama's action raises a serious practical worry. He said the lifting of the embryonic stem cell research ban "places our society on a very steep, very slippery slope.'' Johnson said, "many researchers will not be satisfied to use only so-called surplus embryos'' from clinics that make them to help childless women have babies. Many researchers, he said, want taxpayer support for research not only on embryonic stem cells but on the embryos themselves. Nothing in Mr. Obama's remarks yesterday would limit the National Institutes of Health to ``the use of so-called surplus embryos'' from fertility clinics, he said. Mr. Obama pledged that his administration will write strict guidelines for research on stem cells taken from embryos. ``And we will ensure that our government never opens the door to the use of cloning for human reproduction,'' calling the practice ``dangerous and profoundly wrong.'' Langevin, too, reiterated his opposition to the cloning of human embryos. He also said that, for now at least, he sees to reason to repeal a 1996 law -- known as the Dickey-Wicker Amendment -- that specifically forbids the creation of human embryos for research. CommentsLeave a commentPlease be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish. |
|
|
|
So the Dems can now cheer because not only can we kill a baby in the womb, we can kill them in the lab. You Democrats must be so proud of Obama and your party.
Report Abuse
Stem cell research uses unfertilized eggs. They aren't babies if the egg isn't fertilized. Take a science class.
Report Abuse
Kill a baby in a lab?? Do you have any understanding of how stem cell research works?? Ignorant people like you don't deserve the benefits of what comes out of the research.
Report Abuse
I'm sure I have this wrong, but, aren't embryos eggs that are fertilized? Stem cell research can now use human fertilized eggs. I think that is a bad thing. Human embryos have one purpose: to continue to delvelop to a fully formed human. Fertilization has already taken place. Thats what the debate is about, using fertilized eggs, embyros, for stem cell research.
Report Abuse