Projo 7 to 7 News Blog

The Associated Press

HARTFORD, Conn. -- Seven states -- including Rhode Island and Massachusetts -- sued the federal government today over a new rule that expands protections for doctors and other health-care workers who refuse to participate in abortions and other medical procedures because of religious or moral objections.

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal filed the lawsuit in federal court in Hartford on behalf of the states.

They claim the federal rule, issued by the Bush administration last month and set to take effect Tuesday, would trump state laws protecting women's access to birth control, reproductive health services and emergency contraception.

Blumenthal said the regulations "are flawed and defective" and would "unconstitutionally and unconscionably interfere with women's health-care rights."

Blumenthal said the rule "shrouds the term abortion in new and unnecessary ambiguity" and encourages medical providers to define it themselves and deny patients contraception, including emergency contraception for rape victims.

A call was left seeking comment with a spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Under long-standing federal law, institutions may not discriminate against individuals who refuse to perform abortions or provide a referral for one. The administration has said the new rule is intended to ensure that federal funds don't flow to providers who violate those laws.

"Doctors and other health-care providers should not be forced to choose between good professional standing and violating their conscience," HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said last month when the rule was issued.

President-elect Barack Obama's transition team has said he will deal with "all eleventh-hour regulations" once he is president.

While campaigning in August, Obama criticized the proposal: "This proposed regulation complicates, rather than clarifies the law. It raises troubling issues about access to basic health care for women, particularly access to contraceptives," he said.

California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon and Rhode Island joined Connecticut in the lawsuit, which seeks a court order blocking the new rule.

Planned Parenthood of Federation of America Inc. and National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association said they are filing separate, parallel lawsuits.

Mary Jane Gallagher, president and CEO of the family planning association, said the rule is unnecessary because there have been laws on the books for decades protecting medical providers if they refuse to participate in abortions and sterilization services.

She accused the Bush administration of trying to appease religious conservatives who are opposed to contraception.

"It's all ideology. It is how to appeal to this small minority of people who don't want women and men to have reproductive health choices," she said.

Gallagher said the rule most likely will affect poor and uninsured women who rely on family planning clinics for counseling, education and contraception.

 Tags  lawsuit Obama

Comments

Olga Glomba said:

Please be more straight forward about this.What really worries Planned Parenthood and the like institutions that offers this abortions services in regards to the new law is that if there is any proof of coercive conduct( which there has been cases of that happening) towards any medical professional declining the service that goes against their moral ethics and religious believes.Then in turn they(the clinics) would lose what they really care for most and it is not helping the "poor disadvantaged woman" like they call it.What they really are worried is the money they are going to lose.Be honest and give peace to your concious.God loves you even when you are doing nothing to preserve the most precious thing we all have,the right to live.And you proceed to act without no regards and compassion(that is if you know or it is convenient for you not to know the meaning of that word )of an innocent life that has no way to defend itself in such an early stage in their life.What an easy target to use to make money,that is all it is.

Link | January 21, 2009 9:03 AM
Report Abuse

---

Leave a comment

Please be civil. Vicious comments, personal attacks and profanity won't be published. Name and email are required; email address will not publish.

Name:

Email:

URL:  

Remember personal info?

Captcha:

Type the characters you see in the picture above.