Projo 7 to 7 News BlogTaking the news pulse of Rhode Island and Southeastern Massachusetts, by Providence Journal and projo.com staff, from 7 to 7, every business day |
|
« WaterFire rescheduled for this Saturday night |
Main
| Public can weigh in on proposed RIPTA cuts today »
By John E. Mulligan WASHINGTON -- While the financial rescue bill that passed the Senate last night faces uncertain prospects as the House returns to work on it today, members of Rhode Island's congressional delegation point to signs that opposition to the package may be softening back home. Nevertheless, Rhode Island's congressmen and senators -- all of whom have supported the federal rescue effort -- reported yesterday that public anger and worry over the need to stabilize the financial markets remain at high levels. "I've had more calls and contacts on this than on any other single issue -- immigration, energy prices, or as far as I can remember, even the war,'' Rep. James R. Langevin said in an interview yesterday. But Langevin said the word from his constituents in the Second Congressional District suggests a modest shift in favor of a major federal rescue effort since Monday, when the House shocked the stock market by defeating the first economic stabilization bill. Speaking in rough estimates about hundreds of calls, e-mails and other contacts, Langevin said that for the week or so preceding Monday's dramatic House vote, a commanding majority of the constituents who checked in were either flatly opposed to any such rescue plan, or else "very scared, very nervous, wondering why this was necessary and what was going on." He said "maybe 20 percent were saying 'yes' " and even that fraction tended to express demands for such provisions as a ban on "golden parachutes" for officers of firms that might need rescuing. Democrats Langevin and Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy were in the minority that supported that version of the package as it went down in a narrow defeat Monday, triggering a plunge in stock market averages. Since that shock, the split among constituents contacting Langevin has narrowed, with increasing numbers of Rhode Islanders telling him, "We need to do something, we need to do the right thing." But he said that "almost universally, people want the taxpayers to be protected" if they undertake the risk involved in raising a rescue pool totaling as much as $700 billion in the coming years. "I completely agree," Langevin said. "If this were only to bail out Wall Street, I'd be the first to vote against it." As it stands, Langevin said the bill coming back to the House retains the protections originally written into the bill -- including independent supervision of the Treasury's work on the rescue; curbs on golden-parachute-style bonuses for corporate executives; and a mechanism to give taxpayers and ownership stake in companies participating in the rescue. Before the House votes, Langevin said he intended to examine closely the new compromise that overwhelmingly passed the Senate last night, with Democratic Senators Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island both joining the majority. Speaking as the Senate prepared for that vote, Langevin said the new bill's increased level of federal insurance for bank deposits was an appealing addition to the package. Overall, he said the new bill appears to be stronger than the one defeated Monday. "If that's the case, I'd be inclined to support it." Meanwhile, Langevin speculated about some of the factors that seem to have made his constituents somewhat more open to the arguments for a rescue package. He said one such factor was certainly the 777-point plunge in the Dow Jones average Monday during the hours after the House vote. "People saw their retirement savings drop in value," he said. "That was probably a wake-up call." In addition, Langevin said "people are connecting the dots" between the somewhat abstract phenomenon of market decline and the very concrete difficulties surfacing in their everyday lives. "If credit markets are seizing up," making it tougher for ordinary people to get cars loans, for example, citizens are beginning to conclude that the crisis on Wall Street "is the reason why," Langevin said. The congressman said he heard a sobering report on Tuesday from a Rhode Island Realtor who does business in South County. He said the Realtor told him that some moderately good news -- "they're starting to see some stabilization" in housing prices and a resulting rise in the number of sale agreements -- has been clouded by bad news. "The problem is that people are encountering delays" with getting new mortgages approved, Langevin said, concluding that this problem is a direct result of the credit crunch tied to the financial crisis. "Many people are angry. I'm angry," Langevin said, predicting that there will be efforts in Congress to fix responsibility for the crisis and repair the regulatory structure. "But right now we need action" to stabilize the flow of credit into the economy. CommentsLeave a comment |
|
|
|
I'm one of those that wrote to him very angry. I am still angry that all our senators and representatives are in favor of this blatant waste of taxpayer money. It's simply financially irresponsible to buy up bad loans. The American people will get by. We may need to make some adjustments to our lifestyles, but that's what this is about. Our current lifestyles that we have become comfortable with have caused this problem. Change needs to come from the people, not by increasing our national debt (because we all know the $700,000,000,000 is going to be borrowed from China anyway).
I am a registered Democrat. I voted for Sheldon Whitehouse. I now feel that was a bad decision. I will not be voting for Jim Langevin in November. I will also no longer be voting for Barack Obama. Instead, I will be choosing a third party candidate as my choice for president. I cannot vote for someone who feels it is perfectly fine to spend my hard earned money to bailout a bunch of banks and other financial institutions.
Report Abuse
This should only further illustrate to the people of RI how out of touch Rep. Langevin is with his constituents. The polls in RI are running 70% AGAINST the bailout. Does he not understand what that means??
We are STUCK with Mr.elite, Sheldon, but we have an opportunity here to lose three of the problems that have brought to our knees this past year.
Vote for whoever is running AGAINST Langevin, Reed, and Kennedy. Tell your friends, give them a ride, give your grandparents a ride, give your neighbors $2.00 for the bus to go to the polls as long as they vote AGAINST these clowns.
SAVE RHODE ISLAND!!!
Report Abuse
"Langevin favors bailout, says RI voters beginning to, too"... what utter nonsense. I haven't spoken to ANYONE yet who's in favor of this useless handout to Wall Street.
Report Abuse
Hope you're happy, Democrats. Watch the end of capitalism before your very eyes!
Report Abuse
Has Langevin actually spoken to a RIer within the last three years? I don't mean speaking to Reed or Whitehouse, I mean a real Rhode Islander?
Is he out of his ever loving, liberal mind? The sentiment is softening? From almost every person in RI to everyone minus three people?
I am going to pencil in dead people if Reed, Langevin, Whitehouse have no opponents.
Tingle for Senator or pick from the following dead people; my father, my grandfather, Nathan Hale, Cleopatra, anybody but those idiots!
Report Abuse
Langevin and Kennedy are fools. This bailout is only a continuation of the scam they, Whitehouse and Reed, have been running all along.
Jim
Narragansett, RI
Report Abuse
As a Rhode Islander I sure hope this bailout fails in the House. I was appalled at the tax breaks in the Senate Bill and also the 74 idiots that voted for it.
Report Abuse
As a Rhode Islander and registered Democrat, I am 100% against the "handout" Washington is attempting to forcefeed us.
As much as I can't stop it from passing through, I will remember it when I vote on election day.
Report Abuse